Skip to content


Minimal property damage does not mean minimal injuries

I was speaking with a Seattle chiropractor, Dr. Raymond Sue (http://www.univchiro.com/), a few weeks ago and he was kind enough to share the attached article with me.  The article reviews a study that was conducted by Arthur Croft and Michael Freeman.freeman-article.  Although it can be quite technical, the message is pretty clear.  The amount of property damage to a vehicle is an unreliable predictor of the severity of the injuries which the passengers have suffered.

If you’ve been in an accident that has not caused much damage to your vehicle, don’t listen to an insurance adjuster or anyone else who tells you that you don’t have a claim.  If you think you’ve been injured, go get examined by a doctor or chiropractor and consult an attorney.  Better to be safe than sorry.

As always your comments are welcomed.

Ryan Pauley

Posted in Back and Neck Injuries, Personal Injury.


4 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. zooguezew says

    Hi, Congratulations to the site owner for this marvelous work you’ve done. It has lots of useful and interesting data.

  2. LnddMiles says

    Great post! I’ll subscribe right now wth my feedreader software!

  3. admin says

    Thanks for the comment! Please feel free to explore my other postings.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. Minimal property damage does not mean minimal injuries -Pauley Law … · Legal News – Your Source for Legal News and Advice linked to this post on March 5, 2010

    [...] Excerpt from: Minimal property damage does not mean minimal injuries -Pauley Law … [...]



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.